Wallet Watch

Entries from March 2008

Think twice before you swipe your debit card

March 30, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Do you make simple math errors? The next time you do, you may pay $29 for it.

And if you commit the egregious crime of not knowing how much money is in your bank account, you pay pay upwards of $116.

A recent surveys of “courtesy” overdraft protection found that fees for one overdraft cost an average of $29 at our nation’s largest banks. So the next time you accidentally try to withdraw money from an ATM that overdraws the money in your account, be prepared to pay the consequences. In fact, many banks will allow you to use your debit card for purchases or an an ATM, and won’t tell you when you’re about to overdraw your account and incur a fee.

But what’s particularly egregious is that banks will charge you for each transaction you make when the account is in the red. For example, let’s say you set out Saturday afternoon to run some errands and you don’t realize you have only $30 in your bank account. You use your debit card to pay for $40 in groceries. That’s a $29 fee. Then you buy a $10 lunch on the same debit card. There’s another $29 fee. What if you need to fill up your gas tank for $40? And God forbid you get thirsty and buy a soda for $1.50? There’s two more fees of $29. In this scenario, the bank punishes you with $116 in fees because of your horrendous mistake.

Let’s say on Monday you check your bank account at work and realize your error and transfer money from your savings account to your checking account to bring it back in the black. So, essentially the bank extended you a loan for the roughly 48 hours that you had no money in your savings account. The problem is, in this scenario you borrowed $91.50 and paid $116 in fees.

Sound a little ridiculous? In banks’ own defense, many of them are known for reversing fees in these scenarios when customers complain loud enough.  But I think most Americans would agree that we’d prefer bank accounts that allow us to build assets and get ahead, and don’t particularly care to put up with navigating a labyrinth of fees just to keep our own hard-earned money in a safe place.

 

Categories: checking accounts

Banks relying more on our fees for their income

March 30, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Amount Americans pay every year to banks in fees on checking accounts: $36 million. The Charlotte Observer ran an excellent story about overdraft fees and the numerous other fees associated with bank accounts.  

http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/528936.html

Banks relying more on fees for income

They’re banking on you to pay up

CHRISTINA REXRODE

crexrode@charlotteobserver.com

Add this to the list of things that are getting more expensive: penalties that banks charge you for breaking their rules.

Charges like overdraft fees, stop-payment fees, and ATM surcharges are on the rise, according to a report released last week by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. And that’s not all: The report also says that financial institutions are increasingly relying on such charges to supplement income.

The GAO undertook the study because lawmakers thought consumers might be unaware of the fees they were shelling out on their checking and savings accounts — more than $36 billion in 2006.

The GAO alleges that banks aren’t always making information about their fees readily available to potential customers or on their Web sites; federal banking regulators have said they’ll look into the matter. The banks say that the fees enable them to offer more services to customers; they also point out that the fees are largely avoidable.

That’s cold comfort to consumers like Lori Irvin, a 31-year-old Charlotte resident. She was charged for stopping payment on a check she’d written for some mail-order products that turned out to be faulty. “If you’ve got a stop payment, it’s probably because someone has gotten a hold of your check who shouldn’t have, or someone’s done a disservice to you,” Irvin said. “And then you have to pay $25 to stop your own check?”

According to one measure cited in the federal report, the average stop-payment fee in 2007 was $19.41, a 17 percent increase since 2000, after adjusting for inflation. Overdraft fees increased 11 percent to $23.13, and the charge for returning a deposited item, which happens when you deposit a check that bounces, increased 49 percent to $12.31.

The fee that banks charge their customers for using other banks’ ATMs actually declined, from an average of 92 cents to 69 cents. But Randall Bevan, a Charlotte resident and a customer of BB&T Corp., is irked that it even exists. He was in Philadelphia recently for business and needed cash. BB&T, based in Winston-Salem, has more than 2,000 ATMs, but none are in Pennsylvania. So Bevan, who works in medical sales, used an ATM operated by PNC Bank.

PNC didn’t charge him for the transaction, but BB&T charged him $2, said Bevan, 40.

“I thought that was pretty lame on BB&T’s part,” Bevan said. “It’s not a lot of money. It’s more the principle of the thing.”

What the banks say

BB&T says it is simply passing along the charges: When its customers use other banks’ ATMs, BB&T has to pay a fee to an ATM operating network. Also, four of BB&T’s checking accounts, including its student checking, let users make a certain number of withdrawals each month from foreign ATMs free of charge.”We want customers to avoid those fees, and they can,” said spokesman Bob Denham. “Our hope would be for the client who was hit with the fee to visit one of our branches because somewhere in those four accounts he should be able to qualify, and he won’t have to worry about those fees.”

The American Bankers Association says those fees allow banks to invest in better services for customers. “Sometimes it’s a misnomer to look at these simple stories about fees, because the level of services has gone up,” said Bob Davis, executive vice president of the American Bankers Association.

Besides, some consumer fees have decreased, as the banks point out. The same study in the GAO report found that the fees for some transactions — including ATM annual fees and overdraft transfers linked to a deposit account — had decreased.

Finally, the banks point out that most consumer fees are avoidable. Bank of America spokeswoman Diane Wagner emphasized that the bank launched a campaign last June to teach customers how to avoid charges like overdraft fees. On its Web site and in other literature, the bank outlines tips like setting up e-mail or cell phone alerts for when your account drops below a certain balance.

“We would be delighted if our customers had a positive in their account rather than a negative, and we want them to experience zero overdraft by having materials such as fee education available to them,” Wagner said.

Next month, Bank of America will raise the charge for an overdraft or returned item from $20 to $25.

– Christina Rexrode: 704-358-5170

How to avoid fees

If you’re careful, you can avoid the fees that banks will charge you for breaking their rules. Here are some suggestions on how:

• Only withdraw cash from your own bank’s ATMs. If you can’t get to one of your own bank’s ATMs, get cash by using your debit card at a grocery store, drugstore or discount retailer and choosing the “cash back” option. If your bank doesn’t have many ATMs near you, consider switching banks.

• Keep track of the balance in your checking account by immediately recording every transaction. Also, check with your bank about getting a text message or e-mail every time your account drops below a certain balance.

• Sign up for overdraft protection. You can link your checking account to your savings account or a credit card so you won’t be charged if you spend more than your checking account holds.

Average fees rising

Insufficient funds

$24.18

11 percent increase

Overdraft

$23.13

11 percent increase

Returns of deposited items

$12.31

49 percent increase

$19.41

Stop payment order

17 percent increase

– Source: Government Accountability Office. Fees are adjusted for inflation and reported in 2006 dollars.

Categories: checking accounts

Hot ladies talking money with bald dudes

March 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Maybe the reason so many Americans don’t understand the credit crunch is that the media doesn’t speak our language. They still can’t seem to speak in a way Americans understand, despite having countless reporters and media devoted to it, including two entire cable networks — which in reality are hot ladies talking money with bald dudes.

Even our country’s top economic officials can’t explain it without speaking in gobblydegook.  Check out this interview with former U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow in this clip and Jon Stewart’s translations.

Check it out at: http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/player.jhtml?ml_video=148349&is_large=true 

Categories: credit markets · media and culture

Helping Baby Boomers to understand why Generation Y is drowning in debt

March 22, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Baby Boomers seem to think that the reason that Generation Y is in so much debt is cultural. Baby Boomers were raised in the era of cash only. If you don’t have the money to buy it, then you can’t have it. Getting ahead is about saving: putting aside money for life’s large expenses, such as a downpayment on a home, a car to get you to work, or necessary appliances and items that help middle-class families run. This argument certainly has some merit.

But the reason that Gen Y is in so much debt is that (with apologies to Tamara Draut, from whose book “Strapped” I stole this line) as young adults work to get into the middle class, they’re being hit by a one- two punch: the economy no longer generates widespread opportunity, and our public policies haven’t picked up any of the slack. The price of almost all of life’s necessities has increased since Baby Boomers were Gen Y’s age. The cost of a college education has doubled many times over; getting a mortgage is more difficult; health care is a much bigger burden; and necessities such as gas and childcare are on the rise too.

 So as Gen Y’ers enter the workforce, up to 15 percent of their income goes towards paying off student loans. Homeownership isn’t possible until much later in life, especially in high-cost cities where jobs are most readily available. A college education isn’t worth as much, especially as manufacturing jobs that used to be widely available have vanished. And even jobs in high-tech professions that Gen Y’ers thought were a reliable bet — such as IT — are being shipped overseas. Many who were raised in middle-class suburbs by Baby Boomer parents are learning to live with less.

And it certainly doesn’t help that our nation’s most prestigious financial institutions make it very easy to get into debt. All the expenses that Gen Y can’t afford — what used to be standards of middle-class living — can now be swiped and put on a credit card.

walletwatch gives a big shoutout to conservative columnist David Brooks. In an October 2007 column, he says that the economic vise grip that Gen Y is stuck in is driving their culture — not that Gen Y’s culture of consumption is driving them further into debt. He writes that

During this decade, 20-somethings go to school and take breaks from school. They live with friends and they live at home. They fall in and out of love. They try one career and then try another.

While Brooks could have done a better job of describing these economic trends in more detail, he is spot on when he writes:

The job market is fluid. Graduating seniors don’t find corporations offering them jobs that will guide them all the way to retirement. Instead they find a vast menu of information economy options, few of which they have heard of or prepared for.

It’s possible to see that this period of improvisation is a sensible response to modern conditions.

The column is a great read.

Categories: Gen Y in debt · credit card clarity · media and culture · middle class squeeze

“Up To Our Eyeballs”: New book on debt nails its root causes, solutions

March 22, 2008 · 1 Comment

Kudos to the folks at Demos, a New York-based think tank for not only documenting the root causes of debt but also offering solutions. Their new book “Up to Our Eyeballs” is a must-read for anyone studying the world of young Americans being in so much debt.

A summary in their words:

Up to Our Eyeballs is a lively and timely exploration of the causes and consequences of the explosive rise in consumer debt, and of the fast-spreading financial and economic crisis. After explaining how we got into our credit fix, the authors sketch out a plausible escape route, based on proven good ideas that our political and economic elites have temporarily forgotten, at the expense of the rest of us.

Particularly impressive was the authors’ documentation that the middle class of the 1950s-1980s — which is now being fractured by increasing wealth inequality — was built by deliberate public policies that are now being eroded. That is, the prosperity that so many families experienced during those decades was the result of public-sector programs such as the GI Bill that made college affordable, the Federal Housing Administration that made homeownership a reality, social security that made it easy to save for retirement, and so on. But as our economy started to change, these programs have slowed eroded, and in part have been deliberately shredded by conservative politicians.

While they make an excellent case for implementing a solution, the book is a bit thin on specifics. walletwatch was very impressed by the authors’ knowledge and categorization of recent legislative moves, and with their principles for reform. Specifically, they echo the call for a Financial Product Safety Commission, an idea put forward prominently by Harvard Law Professor and debt guru Professor Elizabeth Warren.

 walletwatch added this book to its Reading List (link above).

Categories: Gen Y in debt · credit card clarity · media and culture · middle class squeeze

Credit Card Securities: Are they Frothy? Bubbly? Explosive?

March 20, 2008 · Leave a Comment

How defaults on credit cards could contribute to the credit crisis.  

Just like mortgages, lenders package our credit card debt into trusts, then sell this debt to investors on Wall Street. As credit card payments are sent to the bank, the bank ships them off to the trusts, where the investors receive their payments from them. This frees up the banks funds so they can make more credit card debt available.

But with more people defaulting on their credit card debt, observers are predicting that the quality of credit card securities will begin to deteriorate. This is what happened in the subprime mortgage market: people who didn’t understand their mortgages began to default on them, which ruined the quality of the securities that these mortgages were packaged into However, observers debate how badly credit card securities will deteriorate.

In a column in the New York Times last week, Joe Nocera says its only “frothy.” But his column shows a lack of evidence as to why increased defaults won’t rattle credit card securities. The “explosive” prediction comes from BusinessWeek, who declares that “The party was paid for with credit cards,” and “the hangover will be a whopper.” It cites weakened securitizations and anecdotes of Americans with debt problems. (Strangely, their article isn’t available online.) The more sensible approach of “bubbly” comes from the Center for American Progress report “House of Cards.”  This report uses Federal Reserve data to illustrate increasing reliance on credit cards, combined with increasing defaults. It only speculates on credit card debt contributing to the credit crisis.

Categories: credit markets

Having trouble understanding the credit crisis? Here’s Credit Crisis 101.

March 19, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Walletwatch is taking a break from its usual content of credit cards and bank accounts to take a look at the larger problem: the credit crisis. This explosion on our nation’s financial markets has the Federal Reserve taking its most vigorous action since the Great Depression. But what exactly is happening, and what does it mean for ordinary Americans?

Even whizzes on Wall Street don’t understand all of it. According to today’s New York Times, even Robert Rubin — the former Treasury Secretary and a Citigroup exec — needs to ask “experts” to explain things to him. This article from today’s New York Times is of great assistance. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/business/19leonhardt.html?hp 

And to understand how credit card debt could contribute to the credit crisis, check out this earlier walletwatch post.

I stole this cartoon from my hometown Cincinnati Enquirer.

CARTOON

Categories: credit card clarity · credit markets

$230 Billion for Wall Street. What about Main Street?

March 18, 2008 · Leave a Comment

This weekend, the Federal Reserve helped to finance a deal to sell the troubled investment bank Bear Stearns to JPMorganChase. As widely repored, Bear was selling for $60 a share last week — and was near $160 last spring — but on Sunday was sold for only $2 a share, which is less than its building on Madison Avenue in NYC is worth.

What does this mean for Joe Blow consumer? While the Fed is willing to bail out large Wall Street firms who make bad decisions — egregiously bad decisions, in fact — it hasn’t done much for regular homeowners, especially for those who now owe more than their homes are worth. While their move to rescue Bear Stearns is certainly warranted to restore confidence to financial markets, you’d think they’d make similar moves to rescue our country’s middle-income Americans.

The federal government ought to do more to help homeowners who made bad decisions, not just Wall Street investors who made bad decisions. Who else does the Fed’s bailout doctrine apply to — any Wall Street firm that fails? Many Washington groups have kicked around the idea of the federal government buying up pools of bad mortgages at a discount and re-finance the borrower into a loan at the present value of the house. While the lender “takes a haircut” under this scenario, everyone has to lose before the situation gets better.

Former Fed Vice Chair Alan Blinder, now a professor at Princeton, wrote this in today’s Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/17/AR2008031702152.html?hpid=opinionsbox1 

First, everyone should take a deep breath. To those living far from the canyons of Manhattan, the sky is not falling. If you don’t want to sell your home, forget about falling house prices. Even on paper, it’s unlikely that you’ve “lost” anything near what you “gained” in the run-up. Yes, the economy is limping, but it’s not collapsing. And the effects of the Fed’s interest rate cuts and the stimulus package that Congress enacted last month are still to come.

Mass.) and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) are working on a fine bill that, by easing some of the stresses in the mortgage market, could do some real good. I urge Frank, Dodd and the Democratic leadership to expedite the process, and congressional Republicans should stop standing in the way.

In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt famously told Americans that “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Unbridled fear is gripping today’s financial markets. We need some soothing words right now — followed by actions, as FDR’s words were. Who will step forward?

Categories: credit markets

Banks make unilateral efforts to improve credit card clarity. Do they work?

March 18, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Americans get outraged by tricky terms and conditions in credit cards. Congress holds hearings into these terms and conditions, but doesn’t have the votes to pass laws that would be meaningful. Seeing this, credit card banks unilaterally make their cards “fair” in anticipation of increased scrutiny over their practices. Do they work? Or is it deception?

For example, Chase touts its “Clear and Simple” plan as “easy-to-use tools and flexible account options that can help you effectively manage your Chase credit card account, maintain your best interest rate, and avoid fees.” Yet the tools that Chase offers under this plan–personalized account alerts, picking your own due date, online payments–seem to be features they already offer, just packaged together.

While their customers surely appreciate Chase putting their information in one spot, their cardholder agreements remain a tangle of legalese. And according to Consumer Action’s Credit Card Survey, Chase can change the terms of their credit card “at any time, for any reason,” thus making increased disclosure of their terms moot.

We appreciate the effort, Chase.

Categories: credit card clarity

Congress holds hearing on opt-out plan for rate increases on credit cards

March 15, 2008 · Leave a Comment

In the House Committee on Financial Services, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) held a hearing looking into a handful of credit card practices. She recently introduced The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act. The key provision in the bill is a plan to allow consumers to opt-out of any interest rate increase within 45 days, and pay off the balance at the existing rate. Currently, 9 of the top 10 cardholder agreements allow the credit card company to change the rate and terms “at any time, for any reason.” The opt-out plan is an excellent compromise between consumers and the industry.

There’s a good writeup of the hearing at U.S. News and World Report.

Categories: credit card clarity